Four letter domains

June 29, 2008 | 4 Letter Guide | RSS 2.0

I have found a usable and very short domain name. It is a four-letter domain that is perfectly possible to pronounce (although it is not any real word), and all the top level domains are free for it. I don’t know how common that is, but I have been told that usable domains like that are very valuable. I have been trying to find out what to do with the domain for weeks, but I run too many sites already and I can’t start a site just because I have a nice domain name…

So, anyone need it? Post a comment and let me know why you need it, and I’ll reveal it to the one person who has the craziest idea (or the best bribe)!

Brent gave me a crazy idea directly: “Put it up for sale on Sedo”. I had promised myself to not get involved with domain sales, but I asked for crazy ideas so I’m giving it a try. If I don’t get the $45 dollars I just spent back from these three domains (.com/.net/.org), I will never do domain business again. More details will follow as soon as I’ve taken care of all details!

1 Comment »

3 Letter Domains - What is the Importance of Letter Quality?

June 17, 2008 | 3 Letter Guide | RSS 2.0

It is probably fair enough to say that letter quality truly resides in the eye of the beholder, and as such, each opinion is valuable.

This said, in declaring what letters are of better or lesser quality, several important factors should be considered, and even then there is not universal agreement. Some of these factors include:

Letter commonality within acronymns
Language
End User potential
Memorability/Branding
Common Usage

Here on 3character.com, I think it is fair to state that by general concensus the premium letters are: A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T. Not every single person agrees with this placement, but very few would argue that these letters are not of premium quality given their commonality in many major languages, commonality in business acronym usage and their increased commonality in end-user sales among LLL domains.

It can get a little grayer on the lesser high quality and lower quality letters. For example, within the english language, Q, X, Y, and Z are much less frequently found and used as the first letter of many words or names. To this end, here is a helpful chart that shows the commonality of letter usage in the english language. This said, commonality of usage and commonality of use as the first letter of a word or name are different concerns to consider. E is by far the most used letter in composing english words, and C and T are used somewhat less in word composition, but yet are very common as the first letter of a name or word. Likewise, X is very rarely used in the composition of english words, but even more rarely is it used as the first letter of an english word or name (and acronym domains are based on words and names).

Transfer your domain to Dotster and pay just $8.99 to renew your domain for an additional year.Click here

So far our focus has been on letter quality in the english language, but as we all recognize, acronym domains are valuable in many other languages as well, and this can place a cloud on what otherwise seems a simple science. For example, Z is not a widely used first letter for words or names in the english language, but is very common in the german language. Someone from Germany might have a very different opinion than someone from the US as to how valuable Z might be as a letter in an acronym or LLL domain.

In the consideration of premium, lesser high quality and lower quality letters, the only real way to guage their placement in these categories is to seek general concensus understandings, which should consider end-user sales by letter type and end-user desire and use for each letter. Though opinions vary on this, it is most generally found that the letters fall in these categories:

A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, L, M, N, O, P, R, S, T are considered premium letters.

Lesser high quality letters include: J, K, U, V, W.

Lower quality letters include: Q, X, Y, Z.

It’s fair to differ with this general concensus, but it is also helpful to try to place these letters in fair general categories based on the factors above, as well as to consider one of the most important factors of all…end-user sales data (one of the greatest strengths of LLL domains for wholesale valuation purposes).

If you or I have a difference of opinion with these categorizations, it’s really alright that we can all agree to disagree. End user sales and end-user usage really win the day and by far trump our own opinions.

So here we are again…perhaps it is all in the eye of the beholder…and most would agree that so far even the beholder of the worst LLL combination in a top extension can’t complain too much.

1 Comment »